Quite often, the scenes painted by HRS artists do not depict actual locations like the work produced by other landscape artists. HRS artists would often travel to many various locations and record their sightings, and paint from both memory and imagination upon returning home.
I see this kind of work as an early version of photomanipulation, however instead of taking photographs and merging them later on using computers, these artists would draw upon their memories and their own imaginations to create these wonderful inspiring compositions based upon what they had seen and what they wished to see.
The following is a few examples of work done by various HRS members

View from Mount Holyoke, Northampton, Massachusetts, after a Thunderstorm—The Oxbow, 1836
Thomas Cole (American, 1801–1848)
Oil on canvas

The Heart of the Andes, 1859
Frederic Edwin Church (American, 1826–1900)
Oil on canvas

The Rocky Mountains, Lander's Peak, 1863
Albert Bierstadt (American, 1830–1902)
Oil on canvas
References
(note to self, reference this properly)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hudson_River_School
http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/hurs/hd_hurs.htm
I am glad to see you researching and posting about contextual work and inspiration. It is interesting that you are drawn to painted landscapes, and I am wondering how you see the difference between a painted and a photographed landscape. Maybe you can reflect on technical aspects such as different lenses and lens angles and also the quality of light and how it differs between mediums.
ReplyDelete